Undergraduate Research Paper Topics - How to Write Research Papers

Undergraduate Research Paper Topics - How to Write Research PapersUndergraduate research writing for dental research paper topics should start with an understanding of the nature of research writing for undergraduates. Students often do not understand the primary importance of research in their field of study. They often put off writing papers and forget to pursue writing assignments because they are so busy attending class and participating in class discussions.Writing papers in this fashion actually diminishes a student's grade point average by not allowing for the time to really get into his or her work. By following the suggestions below, students will be more likely to complete their work with the required time for creative thinking and writing skills. The list is in no particular order.It is important to study your field. When you have an idea for a topic and want to write a research paper, do some research on that topic. Find out what other research done on that topic has reve aled. The more you know about your topic, the better prepared you will be to craft a thorough and interesting topic.When you want to write a research paper, do not forget to use the Internet. Many of the journals and organizations that publish dental research topics also publish and have information on literature related to the topic. Through these sources, you can find valuable resources that can help you craft an engaging paper. These resources can be research that is written by others, which you can use to complement your own paper. You can also use this to add data to your own work.Know your references. For undergraduate research paper topics, read and study all of the literature from the area of your choice, and make sure to include all of the sources. There are usually articles, books, websites, and the like in each area of study. Be sure to do this thoroughly, before you begin to write your paper.Review your notes carefully. In your notes, you should consider all of the infor mation and opinions that you have gathered, from reading books, newspapers, Internet sites, or other writings. You should also review your ideas to make sure that they match up with the studies already conducted.Before you begin to write, check and edit. Once you have had a chance to think through your material, go back over it and make sure that it makes sense. Make sure that your ideas are integrated into your topic and that they make sense to your audience. This will help assure that your paper will not be too dry or boring.Students do not necessarily need to use all of these tips for academic writing. Many people are able to develop their own style. However, if you are just beginning to take up a hobby that involves research, you may find that a combination of the above can help you achieve a more polished presentation.

Medical coverage for smoking related diseases

In the work place, some issues have been arising with the questions about whether the non-smoking employees should pay same medical insurance premium with the smoking employee.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Medical coverage for smoking related diseases specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The argument is that smoking employees should pay a premium to cover their smoking related treatment. This issue has been a point of concern since the 1980s and has remained to be an issue to date. The reasoning from the either side involve economic arguments which a complex and maybe hard to comprehend. However, one of the most oblivious reasons is that it is a deterrent to this behavior, which is harmful to the life of the smoker. The main aim of this paper is to examine the real situation, analyze the fact and propose a reason concerning the matter based on the available facts and opinions. Breadth of the issue One of the most important points to note under this is that this is not an issue of smokers and non-smokers. By extension, it involves everyone who undertakes a life endangering activity knowingly. Therefore, the implication made by the proponents that this is an important step towards eliminating smoking reflects a shortsighted argument. It is oblivious that, if this was to be passed as rule, the soon or later people who engage in dangerous sporting activities will have to pay for their medical coverage in case of injury (Khalid 32; Garfield 16). Furthermore, it will also imply that people who attempt suicide also will have to pay for their medical and rehabilitation fees. This is not yet all the implication of this argument but its gravity is from this point clearer.Advertising Looking for essay on health medicine? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Even though proponents may ask why smokers continue to smoke yet they know the harmful effects of tobacco, it is not always healthy to lay all the blame on their shoulders. This has an implication also on the performance of the public health ministry. It is the mandate of this ministry to conduct public awareness programs and to educate the public on the dangers of some behaviors (Hayry and Hayry 34). Continued smoking by the public is a measure on how this ministry has been performing. This means that, in as much as smokers continue to smoke despite the dangers of smoking, it is the responsibility of the government to educate them about smoking, in which it has failed terribly. Ethical and legal issues One of the most popular arguments among the proponents of this topic is that there is a moral obligation between the doctor and the patient is to promote health- something valued by both parties, and therefore, such a relationship should attract allegiance from both parties otherwise, either party can withdraw from the relationship. First, the assumption that patients place t he same value on health as doctors is vague. Given their profession and training, doctors place highest value on health than anybody else in the society. On the other hand, other people value other thing like money and pleasure than health (Underwood and Bailey 54). From this point of view, the argument that most people see doctors to avoid suffering rather than be healthy is valid. Since the value placed by both parties on health is questionable, then the moral obligation based on this measure is questionable too. A keen analysis reveals that, due to the conflicting values between doctors and patients, the issue of who should receive treatment should lie in the hands of the state and not the doctors.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Medical coverage for smoking related diseases specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The questions hear is whether a person’s behavior will cause them to lose their rightful access to equal medical care. In as much as the state give rights and takes them under certain circumstance, it is important to note that fundamental rights are involved in this case- the right to life (Goodin 58). In other parts of the law, there are basic provisions by the law for people who have committed a criminal offence like fair trial. In medical practice, health is a basic right that regardless of the behavior of the patient and therefore health care services are basic provisions in this regard. Another ethical issue is the fact that one person in their behavior should not endanger the lives of others and where possible, appropriate legislation is necessary. Smokers may endanger lives of others as they may spend many medical resources with their operations at the expense of other patients (Mamode 14). The question is should the doctors use discretion to maximize the well-being of the greater group as opposed to one patient? However, any national health system should acknowledge th at unlike the utilitarian belief that individual rights are forfeitable for the benefit of a bigger group, the financial risks of bad health should be borne by the society as a whole. This would therefore discourage such a sacrifice. Economic reasoning Any nationalized health system seeks to eliminate the disparity between the poor and the rich. If smokers were to pay for their smoking-related medical bills, the rich will pay but the poor will die. However, this will mean more than just that. The drinkers will pay for their bills, reckless drivers and such like (Hayry and Hayry 36). This is a rational utilitarian thought though not well calculated. This will encourage more smoking because soon or later, everyone will die for one reason or another regardless of the person’s promptness in following the doctor’s advice. With regard to the medical expenditure to the society, there is evidence that, by comparing the medical costs to the society by smokers and non-smoker, th e difference may be insignificant.Advertising Looking for essay on health medicine? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More In fact, smokers save the government money by dying early. Research has shown that smoking causes a few problems during the productive years of a person’s life span. It results then that those people die even before they start benefiting from their pensions leaving the non-smoker to enjoy their contributions (Weinkam and Rosenbaum 28). Therefore, government should not forget the financial benefits the tobacco industry brings to them. Another point that proponents seem oblivious of is the other habits that smokers would engage in supposing smoking did not exist and the cost of such behaviors to the state (Hayry and Hayry 34). Therefore, it turns out that denying smokers their medical care on basis of cost to state would extinguish individual rights and if such were on utility basis, then it would encourage smoking. Conclusion Despite the long time that this topic has been out debate, the two sides have not yet come to terms on what is the best practice concerning this issue. O vertime, the reaction to this is that the government tries to change the rules after the game has become. The proponents in this issue have continuously presented half-baked propositional which have failed to provide reasonable grounds for the enactment of regulations regarding the treatment of smokers. Therefore, the resole to date remains holding any restrictions to the issue. Works Cited Garfield, John. â€Å"Let the health authority take the responsibility.† British medical  Journal. 306 (1993): 1050. Web. Goodin, Roner. â€Å"The ethics of smoking.† Ethics. 99 (1989): 574-624. Web. Hayry, Heta and Matti Hayry. â€Å"Utilitarianism, human rights and the redistribution of health through preventative medical measures.† Journal of applied philosophy. 6, 1(1989): 43-51. Print. Khalid, Mohamed. â€Å"Denying treatment is indefensible.†British medical journal. 306 (1993):1408. Web. Mamode, Neal. â€Å"Denying access is more costly.† British medical journal. 306 (1993): 1408. Web. Underwood, Michael and John Bailey. â€Å"Should smokers be offered coronary bypass surgery?† British medical journal. 306 (1993):1047-1050. Web. Weinkam, James and Wilf Rosenbaum. â€Å"Smoking and hospital utilization.† Social  science and medicine. 24 (1987): 983-986. Web. This essay on Medical coverage for smoking related diseases was written and submitted by user Eliza Hogan to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here. Medical coverage for smoking related diseases Table of Contents Breadth of the issue Ethical and legal issues Economic reasoning Conclusion References In the work place, some issues have been arising with the questions about whether the non-smoking employees should pay same medical insurance premium with the smoking employees. The argument is that smoking employees should pay a premium to cover their smoking related treatment. This issue has been a point of concern since the 1980s and has remained up to date. Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Medical coverage for smoking related diseases specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The reasoning from the either side involves economic arguments, which are complex and maybe hard to comprehend. However, one of the most oblivious reasons is that it is a deterrent to this behavior, which is harmful to the life of the smoker. The main aim of this paper is to examine the real situation, analyze the fact and propose a reason concerning the matter based on the available facts and opinions. Breadth of the issue One of the most important points to note under this is that this is not an issue of smokers and non-smokers. By extension, it involves everyone who undertakes a life endangering activity knowingly. Therefore, the implication made by the proponents is that this is an important step towards eliminating smoking reflects a shortsighted argument. If this was to become a rule, eventually the people who engage in dangerous sporting activities will have to pay for their medical coverage in case of injury (Khalid, 1993; Garfield, 1993). Furthermore, it will also imply that people who attempt suicide also will have to pay for their medical and rehabilitation fees. This is not the entire implication of the argument. Even though proponents may ask why smokers continue to smoke yet they know the harmful effects of tobacco, it is not always healthy to lay all the blame on their shoulders. This has an implicati on also on the performance of the public health ministry. It is the mandate of this ministry to conduct public awareness programs and to educate the public on the dangers of some behaviors (Hayry, H. Hayry, M., 1989). Continued smoking by the public is a measure on how this ministry has been performing. This means that, in as much as smokers continue to smoke despite the dangers of smoking, it is the responsibility of the government to educate them about smoking, in which it has failed terribly. Ethical and legal issues One of the most popular arguments among the proponents of this topic is that there is a moral obligation between the doctor and the patient is to promote health- something valued by both parties, and therefore, such a relationship should attract allegiance from both parties otherwise, either party can withdraw from the relationship. Advertising Looking for essay on health medicine? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn M ore First, the assumption that patients place the same value on health as doctors is vague. Given their profession and training, doctors place highest value on health than anybody else in the society. On the other hand, other people value other things like money and pleasure than health (Underwood Bailey 1993). From this point of view, the argument that most people see doctors to avoid suffering rather than be healthy is valid. Since the value placed by both parties on health is questionable, then the moral obligation based on this measure is questionable too. A keen analysis reveals that, due to the conflicting values between doctors and patients, the issue of who should receive treatment should lie in the hands of the state and not the doctors. The questions hear is whether a person’s behavior will cause them to lose their rightful access to equal medical care. In as much as the state give rights and takes them under certain circumstances, it is important to note that f undamental rights are involved in this case- the right to life (Goodin, 1989, p. 26). In other parts of the law, there are basic provisions by the law for people who have committed a criminal offence like fair trial. In medical practice, health can be regarded as a basic right that regardless of the behavior of the patient, health care should be provided as a basic provision. Another ethical issue is the fact that one person in their behavior should not endanger the lives of others and where possible, this should be enforced by law. Smokers may endanger lives of others as they may spend many medical resources with their operations at the expense of other patients (Mamode, 1993, p. 14). The question is should the doctors use discretion to maximize the well-being of the greater group as opposed to one patient? However, any national health system should acknowledge that unlike the utilitarian belief that individual rights can be sacrificed for the benefit of a bigger group, the financ ial risks of bad health should be borne by the society as a whole. This would therefore discourage such a sacrifice. Economic reasoning Any nationalized health system seeks to eliminate the disparity between the poor and the rich. If smokers were to pay for their smoking-related medical bills, the rich will pay but the poor will die. However, this will mean more than just that. The drunkards will pay for their bills, reckless drivers and such like (Hayry, H. Hayry, M., 1989). Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Medical coverage for smoking related diseases specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More This is a rational utilitarian thought though not well calculated. This will encourage more smoking because eventually everyone will die for one reason or another regardless of the person’s promptness in following the doctor’s advice. With regard to the medical expenditure to the society, there is evidence that, by comparing the medical costs to the society caused by smokers and non-smokers, the difference may be insignificant. In fact, smokers save the government money by dying early. Research has shown that smoking causes a few problems during the productive years of a person’s life span. It results then that those people die even before they start benefiting from their pensions leaving the non-smoker to enjoy their contributions (Weinkam Rosenbaum, 1987). Therefore, government should not forget the financial benefits the tobacco industry brings to them. Another point that proponents seem oblivious of is the other habits that smokers would engage in supposing smoking did not exist and the cost of such behaviors to the state (Hayry, H. Hayry, M., 1989). Therefore, it turns out that denying smokers medical care on basis of their medical cost to state would extinguish individual rights and if such is based on utility, then it would encourage smoking. Conclusion Despite the long time t hat this topic has been debated on, the two sides have not yet come to terms on what should be done concerning the issue. Overtime, the reaction to this is that the government tries to change the rules after the game has started. The proponents in this issue have continuously presented half-baked propositions, which have failed to provide reasonable grounds for the enactment of regulations regarding the treatment of smokers. Therefore, the resole to date remains holding any restrictions to the issue. References Garfield, J., (1993). Let the health authority take the responsibility. British medical Journal, 306, 1050. Goodin, R. E., (1989). The ethics of smoking. Ethics, 99,574-624.Advertising Looking for essay on health medicine? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Hayry, H., Hayry, M., (1989). Utilitarianism, human rights and the redistribution of health through preventative medical measures. Journal of applied philosophy, 6(1), 43-51. Khalid, M. I., (1993). Denying treatment is indefensible. British medical journal, 306, (1408), 32-35. Mamode, N., (1993). Denying access is more costly. British medical journal. 306(1408), 36-45. Underwood, M. J., Bailey, J. S., (1993). Should smokers be offered coronary bypass surgery? British medical journal. 306, 1047-1050. Weinkam, J. J., Rosenbaum, W. S., (1987). Smoking and hospital utilization. Social science and medicine, 24, 983-986. This essay on Medical coverage for smoking related diseases was written and submitted by user Christine Berry to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Argumentative Essay Topics For College Technology

Argumentative Essay Topics For College TechnologySome argueative essay topics for college technology can be found in any topic, no matter what the subject. Others will want to make sure that they choose a technology that they feel strongly about. This can make it easier for them to have an argumentative essay topic that they can write about what they like.Technology is one of the big topics for debate for students and teachers alike. There are many topics of debate such as bio-chemistry, biology, human anatomy, and sociology. They all use some type of technology. A student who feels passionately about one of these topics could write an argumentative essay topic for college technology that was written for that topic.Biology and bio-chemistry are probably the two most popular topics for debate in school today. Biology uses things such as electricity, animal DNA, and cells to create a structure that is a lot more complex than the cell, and has a lot more information within it. Bio-chemi stry on the other hand is much simpler, it's made up of chemicals such as ammonia and hydrogen. The different types of these chemicals have different properties and reactions, which is why there are multiple sub-topics of this debate.Human anatomy can also be a topic of debate, but for a very different reason than a biology topic would be. Humans, as a species, has a purpose. The purpose is to reproduce and provide a healthy environment for future generations.Sociology is used in a similar way, except it's used to explain the society or culture that is currently in place. If you would look at history, societies would change very quickly, especially with war. Societies would be destroyed or need to merge into something else. This is why sociology is so important.Even if society is developing faster than ever before, it can still fall into a time when it's civilization decline. This can happen if something happens to the main source of food, or if some type of disaster does happen to the environment. With technology, people will always be able to find work, and some areas are always being developed or improved.Another type of essay that can be written on college technology is that it is needed to help mankind better. This can be used to help explain why it is necessary for man to look for a cure for cancer. Or how it is necessary for man to discover ways to utilize space to the best of its ability. These types of essays can be used for a lot of things, and the exact nature of the essay depends on the person writing it.The arguments for and against a technology for college technology can be long and drawn out. But the argument must be valid and supported by other forms of information to get a good grade. If a student doesn't have a good argument that will get a good grade on their argumentative essay topic for college technology, then they should be careful when they write it, because the argument might not hold up to a question that might be asked during the tes t. Writing an argumentative essay on a technology requires the student to be creative and make sure that they address all sides of the argument before they write the essay, otherwise it will not do any good.

College Argument Essay

College Argument EssayMany a student has landed in this unfortunate situation when they have gotten to the point where they have had enough of their college argument essays. Here are some tips on how to make sure that you get one through the door without the help of college administration. If you follow these tips, you can almost be assured that your essay will get accepted.The first thing that you will want to do is to ask the school administration for assistance. You will then have to provide all of the needed information in order to ensure that you get to your essay without any trouble. These days, it is often possible to get an essay through the school's office without any problems at all.The first tip for getting a college argument essay accepted is to do all of the necessary research before hand. You will need to sit down and write a brief summary of the school and why you are interested in attending. This is one of the best things that you can do to help make sure that your es say is not rejected.It is a good idea to organize your major points into a list of things that you can cover. In many cases, it is always best to have a single essay that covers several different points. You should be able to get an acceptance rate of around 90 percent if you do this correctly.It is also very important to put all of the important details about yourself in the essay. Although this may sound silly, you should include your personal information in this form of expression. Some students find it helpful to include their favorite foods, places, and activities in the essay as well.One of the most important things that you will want to do is to start writing your college argument essay. The process of writing an essay is very similar to writing a story. The story can be told in a number of different ways, but you will want to make sure that you are consistent with the way that you outline your points.The last thing that you want to do is to edit and edit. It is a good idea t o get the college's official opinion on your essay as well. There are also people that have an essay judging service that will allow you to submit your essay.